On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:33 PM, John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 08:08:41AM +0300, Pauli Nieminen wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:47 PM, John W. Linville >> <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > The existing code seemed to be somewhat based on the datasheet, but >> > varied substantially from the vendor-provided driver. This mirrors the >> > handling of the rtl8185 case from that driver, but still neglects the >> > specifics for the rtl8180 hardware. Those details are a bit muddled... >> > >> > Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > --- >> > drivers/net/wireless/rtl818x/rtl8180_dev.c | 11 ++++++++--- >> > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >> I tested this version of patch. Patch didn't apply cleanly for some >> reason even tough when I mnauly typed it diff looks same. > > Please try the v2 version of the patch. Some "back of the envelope" > math suggests that the v2 version of the patch will give numbers more > to your liking. > > John > -- > John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you > linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready. > But version 2 doesn't change the fact that driver is going to report same signal strength even tough I know that only one wifi should have 100 % strength and others less than 50 %. There is only one router in same room with me and all others routers are a lot more father away. So driver is either reading wrong bits from hardware or my hardware is broken. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html