The existing code seemed to be somewhat based on the datasheet, but
varied substantially from the vendor-provided driver. This mirrors the
handling of the rtl8185 case from that driver, but still neglects the
specifics for the rtl8180 hardware. Those details are a bit muddled...
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/rtl818x/rtl8180_dev.c | 11 ++++++++---
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rtl818x/rtl8180_dev.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rtl818x/rtl8180_dev.c
index 4270502..90046dc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/rtl818x/rtl8180_dev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rtl818x/rtl8180_dev.c
@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ static void rtl8180_handle_rx(struct ieee80211_hw *dev)
{
struct rtl8180_priv *priv = dev->priv;
unsigned int count = 32;
+ u8 signal;
while (count--) {
struct rtl8180_rx_desc *entry = &priv->rx_ring[priv->rx_idx];
@@ -130,10 +131,14 @@ static void rtl8180_handle_rx(struct ieee80211_hw *dev)
skb_put(skb, flags & 0xFFF);
rx_status.antenna = (flags2 >> 15) & 1;
- /* TODO: improve signal/rssi reporting */
- rx_status.signal = (flags2 >> 8) & 0x7F;
- /* XXX: is this correct? */
rx_status.rate_idx = (flags >> 20) & 0xF;
+ /* TODO: improve signal/rssi reporting for !rtl8185 */
+ signal = (flags2 >> 17) & 0x7F;
+ if (rx_status.rate_idx > 3)
+ signal = clamp_t(u8, signal, 25, 90);
+ else
+ signal = clamp_t(u8, signal, 30, 95);
+ rx_status.signal = signal;
rx_status.freq = dev->conf.channel->center_freq;
rx_status.band = dev->conf.channel->band;
rx_status.mactime = le64_to_cpu(entry->tsft);
--
1.7.1.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
