On Sunday 06 June 2010 11:29:54 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Fabio Rossi <rossi.f@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 02 June 2010 23:42:14 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Fabio Rossi <rossi.f@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> > Compiling the kernel without ACPI (CONFIG_ACPI=n) gives the following
> >>> > warning:
> >>> >
> >>> > cfg80211: Calling CRDA to update world regulatory domain
> >>> > cfg80211: World regulatory domain updated:
> >>> > (start_freq - end_freq @ bandwidth), (max_antenna_gain, max_eirp)
> >>> > (2402000 KHz - 2472000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm)
> >>> > ath5k 0000:08:01.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17
> >>> > ath5k 0000:08:01.0: registered as 'phy0'
> >>> > ath5k phy0: request_irq failed
> >>> > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> >>>
> >>> Since traces are printed reversed you will have to read my logic from
> >>> bottom to top:
> >>>
> >>> Seems we need to implement the dev_release() op for the class of our
> >>> devices.
> >>
> >> Shall I open a bug in kernel bugzilla to keep trace of this?
> >
> > Nah something else is up...
> >
> > struct class ieee80211_class = {
> > .name = "ieee80211",
> > .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > .dev_release = wiphy_dev_release,
> > .dev_attrs = ieee80211_dev_attrs,
> > #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG
> > .dev_uevent = wiphy_uevent,
> > #endif
> > .suspend = wiphy_suspend,
> > .resume = wiphy_resume,
> > };
>
> This is wireless-testing, not compat-wireless right?
Yes, I'm using the latest wireless-testing.git
Fabio
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
