Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH]wireless:ath9k Disable leds for Apple products.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/26/2010 02:42 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Justin P. Mattock
<justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
On 05/26/2010 02:05 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Justin P. Mattock
<justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx>    wrote:

On 05/26/2010 10:18 AM, John W. Linville wrote:

On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:14:16AM -0700, Justin P. Mattock wrote:


Disable the leds on ath9k for Apple products, since
there is no leds on any of there machines(or non that I can find!!).

  Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx>

Our team has confirmed Apple devices do not have LEDs so a change like
this is OK but this patch is wrong anyway. More details below.


  void ath_init_leds(struct ath_softc *sc)
  {
        char *trigger;
        int ret;

+       /* Apple has no leds lights for their wireless.  */
+       if (dmi_check_system(dmi_system_table)>      0)
+               return -ENODEV;
+       else
+
        if (AR_SREV_9287(sc->sc_ah))
                sc->sc_ah->led_pin = ATH_LED_PIN_9287;
        else


Surely we don't need the 'else'.

Does enabling the LEDs on these systems cause any problems?

John


I picked up the idea, from this patch:
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2010/1/20/4530535
while looking into a bug for ath9k(thinking maybe leds
are causing something, which want  the case)

so Id have to say I don't think the leds cause issue's,
if anything just a wasted symlink, call, or whatever
in /sys/class/leds/*

The patch is wrong anyway, ath_init_leds() is void and yet you return
a value. If this is really needed I'd also prefer if you define a bool
or something and use a ah->ignore_leds and set this to true if the DMI
stuff checks out for Apple up hw init. Then check for ignore_leds
prior to calling ath_init_leds() and also avoid it if set. Also check
for ingore_leds upon device cleanup and ignore the
acancel_delayed_work_sync(&sc->ath_led_blink_work) and
ath_deinit_leds() and skip that.

But given that it is not needed it seems a lot of work for something
that is a non-issue.

   Luis


tough to say!! I was looking into a bug a few months back, and
thought hmm.. maybe something is being called with the leds
but the leds are not there causing some thing to crap out..

so out of curiosity I remembered the dmi disable patch, and
semi somewhat pieced it together(just to see the results of disabling the
leds).
unfortunately still hit the strange thing with wpa_supplicant and ath9k(the
disconnect thing).

as for the above procedure(I can give that a try.. but it might
take a while...)
OK thanks for the details, best just ignore it unless you can prove it
fixes an issue.

  Luis

at this point the only thing I can think of(if anything),
would maybe a wakeup with powertop or something in
the area of power management(but haven't looked into it).

In any case Thanks for having a look at the ath_print
earlier..

cheers,

Justin P. Mattock
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux