On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:33:04 -0400 "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Please note these two patches together with "QoS fixes": > > - mac80211: explicitly disable/enable QoS > > - iwlwifi: manage QoS by mac stack > > resolve: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558002 > > > > "QoS fixes" alone resolve: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539878 > > > > So I think we want all 4 patches in stable. > > > > John,if possible push patches to Linus tree. When they lend there, > > I will post backported patches to stable ML. I have them already > > prepared ant tested for 2.6.32 :) > > It is fairly late in the 2.6.34 cycle, and it isn't obvious to me > that these fix any sort of regression. Am I wrong? If you count as regression bugs introduced in 2.6.34 development cycle, these are not regression. Bugs are Fedora 12 regression over Fedora 11, so most likely these bugs were introduced in 2.6.32 or 2.6.31 kernel. I have no strong filings to fix them fast, since we have them unfixed for long time and not hear many complains. We may fix them for Fedora now, and post to -stable after some more testing and 2.6.34 release. Cheers Stanislaw -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
