On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 03:33:37PM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 03:17:04PM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > If AP do not provide us supported rates before assiociation, send > > all rates we are supporting instead of empty information element. > > Please note these two patches together with "QoS fixes": > - mac80211: explicitly disable/enable QoS > - iwlwifi: manage QoS by mac stack > resolve: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558002 > > "QoS fixes" alone resolve: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539878 > > So I think we want all 4 patches in stable. > > John,if possible push patches to Linus tree. When they lend there, > I will post backported patches to stable ML. I have them already > prepared ant tested for 2.6.32 :) It is fairly late in the 2.6.34 cycle, and it isn't obvious to me that these fix any sort of regression. Am I wrong? John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
