On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 07:58 +0300, Juuso Oikarinen wrote: > > Or actually, wouldn't it make sense to move the pm_qos logic here (into > > cfg80211)? > > I thought about that but then I realised that would contradict with one > of the arguments presented against the dynamic ps API I proposed > earlier. The argument specifically stated we don't want the API as in > the future there will be some uber-cool psm implementations in some > (full-mac?) chipsets that don't even use a value like this. > > Therefore I opted to leave the implementation in mac80211, thinking that > the entire configuration option will be removed from the cfg80211 once > the wext is gone. Fair enough. I just thought that IFF the device wants to use a similar algorithm, it should use the exact same one. But we can cross that bridge when we have a device. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
