On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 12:14 +0300, Juuso Oikarinen wrote: > Now that the mac80211 is choosing dynamic ps timeouts based on the ps-qos > network latency configuration, configure a default value of -1 as the dynamic > ps timeout in cfg80211. This value allows the mac80211 to determine the value > to be used. > > Signed-off-by: Juuso Oikarinen <juuso.oikarinen@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > net/wireless/core.c | 3 ++- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/wireless/core.c b/net/wireless/core.c > index 6ac70c1..37d0e0a 100644 > --- a/net/wireless/core.c > +++ b/net/wireless/core.c > @@ -705,7 +705,8 @@ static int cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call(struct notifier_block * nb, > wdev->ps = true; > else > wdev->ps = false; > - wdev->ps_timeout = 100; > + /* allow mac80211 to determine the timeout */ > + wdev->ps_timeout = -1; > if (rdev->ops->set_power_mgmt) > if (rdev->ops->set_power_mgmt(wdev->wiphy, dev, > wdev->ps, Does that need some API doc updates to indicate, as part of the cfg80211 API, that -1 means some way of setting it by default? Or actually, wouldn't it make sense to move the pm_qos logic here (into cfg80211)? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
