On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Common sense says: > (0x8516, 0x2070) is RT2070 > (0x8516, 0x2770) is RT2770 > (0x8516, 0x2870) is RT2870 > [...] > > but Allwin doesn't sell USB dongles nor PCI boards, only voip-routers > http://www.allwin.com.tw/eng/modules/tinyd0/content/index.php?id=1 But how about the case where the company name is wrong and the ID's are valid? That means we only should update the comment, rather then deleting the ID's. > Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800usb.c | 8 -------- > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800usb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800usb.c > index df7666f..41de405 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800usb.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800usb.c > @@ -1019,14 +1019,6 @@ static struct usb_device_id rt2800usb_device_table[] = { > * Unclear what kind of devices these are (they aren't supported by the > * vendor driver). > */ > - /* Allwin */ > - { USB_DEVICE(0x8516, 0x2070), USB_DEVICE_DATA(&rt2800usb_ops) }, > - { USB_DEVICE(0x8516, 0x2770), USB_DEVICE_DATA(&rt2800usb_ops) }, > - { USB_DEVICE(0x8516, 0x2870), USB_DEVICE_DATA(&rt2800usb_ops) }, > - { USB_DEVICE(0x8516, 0x3070), USB_DEVICE_DATA(&rt2800usb_ops) }, > - { USB_DEVICE(0x8516, 0x3071), USB_DEVICE_DATA(&rt2800usb_ops) }, > - { USB_DEVICE(0x8516, 0x3072), USB_DEVICE_DATA(&rt2800usb_ops) }, > - { USB_DEVICE(0x8516, 0x3572), USB_DEVICE_DATA(&rt2800usb_ops) }, > /* Amigo */ > { USB_DEVICE(0x0e0b, 0x9031), USB_DEVICE_DATA(&rt2800usb_ops) }, > { USB_DEVICE(0x0e0b, 0x9041), USB_DEVICE_DATA(&rt2800usb_ops) }, > -- > 1.6.6.1 > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
