Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> + udelay(200); >>> + } >> >> Is the udelay() really needed here? In my opinion msleep(), for >> example with a value of 5 ms, would be nicer from system point of >> view. It doesn't matter if this function takes few milliseconds >> longer, because this is called only in op_start(). What do you think? > > It normally takes something like 700-1000us, so I guess I can replace > with msleep(1) if you think it's better. Yes, that's better. It's always good to avoid busylooping. -- Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
