Search Linux Wireless

Re: [rt2x00-users] [PATCH 4/9] rt2x00: Remove rt2800 version constants.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ivo van Doorn a écrit :
On Thursday 08 April 2010, Gertjan van Wingerde wrote:
The rt2800 version constants are inconsistent, and the version number don't
mean a lot of things anyway. Use the literal values in the code instead of
some sort of fabricated version name macro.

Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@xxxxxxxxx>

Perhaps a more elegant way of using and defining needs to be found.
But at least the defined show what the purpose for the values is
rather then having magical values spread around the code.

Ivo

Agreed, it's a lot better to avoid hardcoded value. #define adds a meaning to the numeric value and if such define needs to be changed, there's only one place to change, avoiding bugs by duplicating hardcoded values and only changing one instance.

Even, #define MCS_0 0 is useful :-)

Regards,
Benoit

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux