On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 15:41 +0200, Marco Porsch wrote: > That makes any scripting impossible, because it would mean a fine timing > between the ifup on the stations. Also I think you can't build complex > topologies this way. Hmm, you're probably right. > The alternative iw dev <devname> mpath set <destination MAC address> > next_hop <next hop MAC address> is not useful (if it is still included > though ^^) because it sets paths hard. Means that these paths are not > changed, even if they are broken. > > Well, you're the maintainer. Your choice. > > By the way: which was the last version with 'station del' in mesh > intact? Which codeparts would have to be exchanged if i'd like to use > this further? Only iw and nl80211? Actually I think you only need to change a line in nl80211.c allowing deleting; in fact deleting is OK (and thus I think we can put a patch in adding it back) -- adding was the problem. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
