>> Aha! That's very interesting, then. So, given that the previous naive >> power-saving implementation worked well for me (and I presume other >> users as well), would it be possible to use/provide that old naive >> technique for 3945 and 4965? > We could look into this. Could you please submit a request for this > change to http://bugzilla.intellinuxwireless.org/ ? Done. > If there is a need for this then I think what can be done here is either > use the current debugfs "sleep_level_override" or maybe some new one to > get to the old behavior. Currently modifying this value will be ignored > if power saving is marked as broken, as is done for 3945. I wonder if we > can modify it such that user can change this setting even if power > saving is marked as broken. This is maybe something you can try out. Thanks, I'm going to take a look at it, Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
