Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > So you still don't like a common module approach? I guess I can wait > to see your patch. I don't know, Luis. It seems a bit cleaner to me, just ath.ko, ath9k_hw.ko and ath9k.ko But I don't really care, anyway - maybe we can just dump this series and use ath9k_common.ko as such. I'll send patches removing lib.c from ath9k_htc. > Year I hear you, so there are two things I think we can do in the long > run to bring in mac80211 helpers together. The first one is to remove > the ath9k wiphy. The second is to use a threaded ISR and change our > bottom halves to use a workqueue instead of a tasklet so we can also > sleep during our work. I think these two things should enable us to > start sharing some callbacks. But ath9k virtual wiphy seems to provide > some functionality we don't yet have in mac80211/cfg80211 centrally > but we could work on that. My vote is to keep the drivers separate. Sujith -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
