Search Linux Wireless

Re: LP-PHY Fatal DMA error 0x00000800 on non-ULV Core 2 Duo?!?!!??!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2010/2/28 Nathan Schulte <reklipz@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 2010/2/28 Gábor Stefanik <netrolller.3d@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> OK, this dump shows the 0x280a write happening with core 3, i.e. PCIE,
>> active. So, it is indeed probably the "PCIE misc configuration"
>> routine. Why it's 0x280a is still a mystery to me, it should be 0x100a
>> according to the specs.
> Unless I'm reading the logs wrong, isn't wl setting bit 0x8000 when
> core 1 is mapped (0 indexed cores, 0x18001000 mapped to space 0)?
> And b43 appears to do it when core 0 is mapped (0x18000000 mapped to
> space 0).  b43 also reads from 0x100a after writing to 0x280a, and it
> reads as 0x8000 not set (while the 0x280a check show it is set).
>
> This is when comparing the wl_cold and b43_cold logs.
>
> -Nate
>

The latest patch, which is a partial success according to some
testers, writes to core 1 (PCI-E) instead of core 0 (ChipCommon).

-- 
Vista: [V]iruses, [I]ntruders, [S]pyware, [T]rojans and [A]dware. :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux