On 25/02/2010 21:53, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 09:46:22PM +0100, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
Hi,
Overall this patch has great similarities to something which Josef (CC added)
has posted earlier. The patch in question was not merged due to some issues,
but he is working on an updated. You might want to synchronize your work
with him. :)
I was just looking at this patch series, but I couldn't get it to apply at all.
Alban, does your patch series depend on other patches not in wireless-testing?
It may have just been the whitespaces or something, cause the context looked
right, it just wouldn't apply anything. Anyway I'm happy to work together, or
I can just send you what I have and I'll be the guinea pig, since this really
isn't my area of expertise. Thanks,
Well I cannot agree on the replacement from TX_STA_FIFO by DMA DONE
interrupts
handlers. As the latter prevents from having any success/failure status.
The txdone was borked and could not worked since WirelessCliId was read
as a queue entry index
and written as an encryption key. What you noticed too though with the
weird values you got.
Could you try
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/47183
probably and also "pull" from
http://git.prahal.homelinux.net/?p=rt2x00.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/rtt3070v2-next-debug.
It is not a clean set of patches though I am doing my best to get it
ready at least for to be sent to the ML.
The last commits adds a lot of printk (this is a debug branch) to try to
decipher a weird issue with long range issues.
Best regards
Alban
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
