On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 22:10 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> [NL80211_ATTR_COOKIE] = { .type = NLA_U64 },
> [NL80211_ATTR_TX_RATES] = { .type = NLA_NESTED },
> + [NL80211_ATTR_PS_STATE] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
> };
Looks good to me, though typically we use NLA_U32 for enums. Should we
deviate from that because we won't ever extend this anyway, or should we
use NLA_U32 to be more consistent?
johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
