Search Linux Wireless

Re: Coordinating development for Bluetooth 3.0 between 802.11 and BT trees

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi John,

> > Wanted to get your feedback on what you think would be the best
> > approach to take for focus on development for Bluetooth 3.0 support.
> > Hoping there is a better solution than using linux-next.
> 
> I'm sure Marcel and Johannes are way ahead of us on this. :-)
> 
> I think you covered the basics, but you did leave-out the possibility
> of using net-next-2.6 for bleeding-edge development of bluetooth 3.
> Since both Marcel and I feed Dave's tree and Dave endeavours to
> keep the history of that tree stable then this would seem like your
> best bet.

if we reach the point where any kind of coordination is needed between
your and my tree, I would just merge into wireless-next-2.6 tree instead
of net-next-2.6. That should solve most issues around this anyway. And
in case it doesn't we will always need manual interaction on one side.
So I wouldn't try to overthink this right now.

The only tricky part I see is wireless-testing since bluetooth-testing
is not immutable right now. And I don't have any intention to make it
that way.

Regards

Marcel


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux