2010/1/17 Gábor Stefanik <netrolller.3d@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Michael Buesch <mb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sunday 17 January 2010 17:37:29 Gábor Stefanik wrote: >>> While you are at it, why aren't you programming these table writes? >>> The table handling functions are AFAIK already in place... >> >> Because we like small patches. >> Please do _not_ increase the patchsize. > > They do not increase patch size - table reads/writes are one-line (in > fact, they are shorter than the placeholder comments in place of > them). Well, I just started implementing code without understanding of tables... and got stick in implementing functions. There are some "crazy" IDs, offsets and it's not only writing but also some mysterious table reading... You know, it just sounds scary ;) I'll have to finally read specs/existing code for tables, understand it and implement. -- Rafał -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
