From: Juuso Oikarinen <juuso.oikarinen@xxxxxxxxx>
The wl1271 has a hardware bug which causes it to randomly (very infrequently)
to fail powering up properly. This patch implements retry for the chipset boot
sequence, to work around the hardware problem.
Signed-off-by: Juuso Oikarinen <juuso.oikarinen@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_main.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++------------
1 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_main.c
index d07f035..0795bf3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_main.c
@@ -47,6 +47,8 @@
#include "wl1271_cmd.h"
#include "wl1271_boot.h"
+#define WL1271_BOOT_RETRIES 3
+
static struct conf_drv_settings default_conf = {
.sg = {
.per_threshold = 7500,
@@ -645,7 +647,7 @@ static int wl1271_chip_wakeup(struct wl1271 *wl)
ret = wl1271_setup(wl);
if (ret < 0)
- goto out_power_off;
+ goto out;
break;
case CHIP_ID_1271_PG20:
wl1271_debug(DEBUG_BOOT, "chip id 0x%x (1271 PG20)",
@@ -653,38 +655,34 @@ static int wl1271_chip_wakeup(struct wl1271 *wl)
ret = wl1271_setup(wl);
if (ret < 0)
- goto out_power_off;
+ goto out;
break;
default:
- wl1271_error("unsupported chip id: 0x%x", wl->chip.id);
+ wl1271_warning("unsupported chip id: 0x%x", wl->chip.id);
ret = -ENODEV;
- goto out_power_off;
+ goto out;
}
if (wl->fw == NULL) {
ret = wl1271_fetch_firmware(wl);
if (ret < 0)
- goto out_power_off;
+ goto out;
}
/* No NVS from netlink, try to get it from the filesystem */
if (wl->nvs == NULL) {
ret = wl1271_fetch_nvs(wl);
if (ret < 0)
- goto out_power_off;
+ goto out;
}
- goto out;
-
-out_power_off:
- wl1271_power_off(wl);
-
out:
return ret;
}
int wl1271_plt_start(struct wl1271 *wl)
{
+ int retries = WL1271_BOOT_RETRIES;
int ret;
mutex_lock(&wl->mutex);
@@ -698,35 +696,48 @@ int wl1271_plt_start(struct wl1271 *wl)
goto out;
}
- wl->state = WL1271_STATE_PLT;
-
- ret = wl1271_chip_wakeup(wl);
- if (ret < 0)
- goto out;
-
- ret = wl1271_boot(wl);
- if (ret < 0)
- goto out_power_off;
-
- wl1271_notice("firmware booted in PLT mode (%s)", wl->chip.fw_ver);
+ while (retries) {
+ retries--;
+ ret = wl1271_chip_wakeup(wl);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto power_off;
- ret = wl1271_plt_init(wl);
- if (ret < 0)
- goto out_irq_disable;
+ ret = wl1271_boot(wl);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto power_off;
- /* Make sure power saving is disabled */
- ret = wl1271_acx_sleep_auth(wl, WL1271_PSM_CAM);
- if (ret < 0)
- goto out_irq_disable;
+ ret = wl1271_plt_init(wl);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto irq_disable;
- goto out;
+ /* Make sure power saving is disabled */
+ ret = wl1271_acx_sleep_auth(wl, WL1271_PSM_CAM);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto irq_disable;
-out_irq_disable:
- wl1271_disable_interrupts(wl);
+ wl->state = WL1271_STATE_PLT;
+ wl1271_notice("firmware booted in PLT mode (%s)",
+ wl->chip.fw_ver);
+ goto out;
-out_power_off:
- wl1271_power_off(wl);
+irq_disable:
+ wl1271_disable_interrupts(wl);
+ mutex_unlock(&wl->mutex);
+ /* Unlocking the mutex in the middle of handling is
+ inherently unsafe. In this case we deem it safe to do,
+ because we need to let any possibly pending IRQ out of
+ the system (and while we are WL1271_STATE_OFF the IRQ
+ work function will not do anything.) Also, any other
+ possible concurrent operations will fail due to the
+ current state, hence the wl1271 struct should be safe. */
+ cancel_work_sync(&wl->irq_work);
+ mutex_lock(&wl->mutex);
+power_off:
+ wl1271_power_off(wl);
+ }
+ wl1271_error("firmware boot in PLT mode failed despite %d retries",
+ WL1271_BOOT_RETRIES);
out:
mutex_unlock(&wl->mutex);
@@ -882,6 +893,7 @@ static struct notifier_block wl1271_dev_notifier = {
static int wl1271_op_start(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
{
struct wl1271 *wl = hw->priv;
+ int retries = WL1271_BOOT_RETRIES;
int ret = 0;
wl1271_debug(DEBUG_MAC80211, "mac80211 start");
@@ -895,30 +907,42 @@ static int wl1271_op_start(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
goto out;
}
- ret = wl1271_chip_wakeup(wl);
- if (ret < 0)
- goto out;
-
- ret = wl1271_boot(wl);
- if (ret < 0)
- goto out_power_off;
-
- ret = wl1271_hw_init(wl);
- if (ret < 0)
- goto out_irq_disable;
-
- wl->state = WL1271_STATE_ON;
+ while (retries) {
+ retries--;
+ ret = wl1271_chip_wakeup(wl);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto power_off;
- wl1271_info("firmware booted (%s)", wl->chip.fw_ver);
+ ret = wl1271_boot(wl);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto power_off;
- goto out;
+ ret = wl1271_hw_init(wl);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto irq_disable;
-out_irq_disable:
- wl1271_disable_interrupts(wl);
+ wl->state = WL1271_STATE_ON;
+ wl1271_info("firmware booted (%s)", wl->chip.fw_ver);
+ goto out;
-out_power_off:
- wl1271_power_off(wl);
+irq_disable:
+ wl1271_disable_interrupts(wl);
+ mutex_unlock(&wl->mutex);
+ /* Unlocking the mutex in the middle of handling is
+ inherently unsafe. In this case we deem it safe to do,
+ because we need to let any possibly pending IRQ out of
+ the system (and while we are WL1271_STATE_OFF the IRQ
+ work function will not do anything.) Also, any other
+ possible concurrent operations will fail due to the
+ current state, hence the wl1271 struct should be safe. */
+ cancel_work_sync(&wl->irq_work);
+ mutex_lock(&wl->mutex);
+power_off:
+ wl1271_power_off(wl);
+ }
+ wl1271_error("firmware boot failed despite %d retries",
+ WL1271_BOOT_RETRIES);
out:
mutex_unlock(&wl->mutex);
--
1.6.3.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
