On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@xxxxxx> wrote: > "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> I still see value in a tree that has a reasonably stable base and >> contains both wireless fixes and wireless features. > > I agree, it makes things a lot easier. > >> So, I think wireless-testing remains as the focal point for wireless >> LAN testing and development. I'll just be getting patches there in a >> slightly different process. > > Sounds very good. So I'll continue using wireless-testing. Thanks. But we use wireless-next as base though if we want to send you pull requests, ay? Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
