Hi Luis. Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > You started with: [...] This alone is an invitation for discussion > between MadWifi and ath5k as supported drivers. My original motivation is explained on [1]. In a few words: I wonder whether the MadWifi project has a future, and if yes, what this future could look like. This includes stuff like "what can the project (as an entity) do to contribute to bringing ath[59]k forward" and "what can we do to allow users for a smooth transition from MadWifi to ath[59]k". I did start the survey in the hope that it helps to identify fields for improvements, which could also be possible future tasks for the project. The introduction to the survey is a description of the positions I saw as answers on my "future of the project" post on the madwifi-project mailing list. Not more, not less. Although I have my own opinion an all this I've tried to keep a neutral position. But to put it straight: I'm not trying to discredit the efforts and advancements that have been made on ath[59]k. I do not intend to question whether ath[59]k is the future. I do not intend to revive the MadWifi (the driver) development in some way or the other, nor am I promoting to add new features to MadWifi (the driver). And I do not intend to play off ath5k against MadWifi. So please, stop to allege me of such BS. Bye, Mike [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.madwifi.project/165 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
