On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 14:49 +0200, Holger Schurig wrote: > This is a monster patch that makes CFG80211/WEXT operation > configurable. My cfg80211-RFC/WIP-Patch would come on top of it, > but would then be quite small, e.g. almost only changed to > cfg.c/cfg.h. > > As there's no mesh/adhoc/monitor mode implemented in cfg80211- > mode, I added many, many #ifdef/#endif pairs. Maybe too many. > Is this too ugly? Or would this patch be applyable as-is ? > > If the patch is perceived to be too ugly, I could create an > monitor.h/monitor.c file and singleout everything related to > monitoring in it, where monitor.h would resolv to dummy static > functions in the cfg80211-case ... at least as long as we don't > have monitor suppport in libertas+cfg80211. The same for mesh > support, e.g. here I could create a mesh.h/mesh.c and do the > same. I really don't understand the point. Can't you just use the cfg80211 hooks and keep both functional at the same time? Just like orinoco does -- it uses cfg80211 only partially. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
