On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 03:36:15PM -0700, reinette chatre wrote: > On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 14:24 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:34:19PM -0700, reinette chatre wrote: > > > commit cc0f555d511a5fe9d4519334c8f674a1dbab9e3a > > > Author: Jay Sternberg <jay.e.sternberg@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Date: Fri Jul 17 09:30:16 2009 -0700 > > > > > > iwlwifi: Handle new firmware file with ucode build number in header > > > > > > commit cce53aa347c1e023d967b1cb1aa393c725aedba5 > > > Author: Jay Sternberg <jay.e.sternberg@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Date: Fri Jul 17 09:30:22 2009 -0700 > > > > > > iwlwifi: update 1000 series API version to match firmware > > > > > > commit 02c06e4abc0680afd31bf481a803541556757fb6 > > > Author: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Date: Fri Jul 17 09:30:14 2009 -0700 > > > > > > iwlagn: modify digital SVR for 1000 > > > > > > commit 415e49936b4b29b34c2fb561eeab867d41fc43a6 > > > Author: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Date: Thu Aug 13 13:30:54 2009 -0700 > > > > > > iwlwifi: traverse linklist to find the valid OTP block > > > > > > commit f7ea097d9b4e61a816c041c92548aad7c7ed7915 > > > Author: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Date: Fri Jul 24 11:13:12 2009 -0700 > > > > > > iwlagn: fix null pointer access during ucode load on 1000 > > > > > > Thank you very much > > > > Is this the order in which they should be applied? > > The first three patches from this list can be applied directly from > linux-2.6 in the order they appear here. That is: > > commit cc0f555d511a5fe9d4519334c8f674a1dbab9e3a > Author: Jay Sternberg <jay.e.sternberg@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri Jul 17 09:30:16 2009 -0700 > > iwlwifi: Handle new firmware file with ucode build number in header > > commit cce53aa347c1e023d967b1cb1aa393c725aedba5 > Author: Jay Sternberg <jay.e.sternberg@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri Jul 17 09:30:22 2009 -0700 > > iwlwifi: update 1000 series API version to match firmware > > commit 02c06e4abc0680afd31bf481a803541556757fb6 > Author: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri Jul 17 09:30:14 2009 -0700 > > iwlagn: modify digital SVR for 1000 > > > The fourth patch needed backporting and is attached. > > After doing the backporting I determined that the fifth patch is not > needed. > > Thank you very much for taking these patches Ok, I've taken all of these, but wow, those are big patches, much larger than we normally take for the -stable tree. I don't want to have to do this again please. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
