On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:34:19PM -0700, reinette chatre wrote: > Hi, > > A few distributions would like to enable the new 1000 series Intel > wireless hardware (Intel WiFi Link 1000BGN) in their next releases that > are based on 2.6.31. This hardware is not usable in 2.6.31, but it can > be enabled in this kernel with the addition of five patches. > > Until now we have been providing the distributions with this list of > patches to do their own backporting. > > Since this seems to be a general problem for distributions and users > alike, is it possible to consider these enabling patches for inclusion > into 2.6.31? > > Here is the list: > > commit cc0f555d511a5fe9d4519334c8f674a1dbab9e3a > Author: Jay Sternberg <jay.e.sternberg@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri Jul 17 09:30:16 2009 -0700 > > iwlwifi: Handle new firmware file with ucode build number in header > > commit cce53aa347c1e023d967b1cb1aa393c725aedba5 > Author: Jay Sternberg <jay.e.sternberg@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri Jul 17 09:30:22 2009 -0700 > > iwlwifi: update 1000 series API version to match firmware > > commit 02c06e4abc0680afd31bf481a803541556757fb6 > Author: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri Jul 17 09:30:14 2009 -0700 > > iwlagn: modify digital SVR for 1000 > > commit 415e49936b4b29b34c2fb561eeab867d41fc43a6 > Author: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu Aug 13 13:30:54 2009 -0700 > > iwlwifi: traverse linklist to find the valid OTP block > > commit f7ea097d9b4e61a816c041c92548aad7c7ed7915 > Author: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri Jul 24 11:13:12 2009 -0700 > > iwlagn: fix null pointer access during ucode load on 1000 > > Thank you very much Is this the order in which they should be applied? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html