2009/9/16 reinette chatre <reinette.chatre@xxxxxxxxx>: > > The important information is not what you posted here, but still in the > dmesg file you provided. In that log we see the following right before > the warnings: > > [ 163.126590] wlan0: direct probe to AP 00:1b:11:f6:0f:28 (try 1) > [ 163.130027] wlan0 direct probe responded > [ 163.130032] wlan0: authenticate with AP 00:1b:11:f6:0f:28 (try 1) > [ 163.131924] wlan0: authenticated > [ 163.131952] wlan0: associate with AP 00:1b:11:f6:0f:28 (try 1) > [ 163.134325] wlan0: RX ReassocResp from 00:1b:11:f6:0f:28 (capab=0x431 status=0 aid=1) > [ 163.134331] wlan0: associated > [ 163.155938] wlan0: deauthenticating by local choice (reason=3) > > It shows that association was successful, but something in userspace requested a disconnect. Hmm. Yes, connect takes more time than in 2.6.31. > >> >> [ 163.208063] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >> [ 163.208114] WARNING: at net/mac80211/scan.c:267 >> ieee80211_scan_completed+0x299/0x2b0 [mac80211]() > > I cannot get an exact line match based on the kernel information you > provided. I assume it is the first warning in > ieee80211_scan_completed(). This is not serious as it indicates that > mac80211 received a "scan completed" indication when it was not > scanning. > > >> [ 163.232845] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >> [ 163.232908] WARNING: at net/wireless/core.c:613 >> wdev_cleanup_work+0xbb/0xe0 [cfg80211]() > > This warning has just been reported in linux-wireless also. Perhaps you > can follow its discussion there. See > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/39607 Thanks for information -- Maciej Rutecki http://www.maciek.unixy.pl -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
