On 7/30/09, Luis Correia <luis.f.correia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Mike, > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:55, Johannes Berg<johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 11:44 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > >> On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 11:29 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > >> > On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 11:22 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > >> > > >> > > drivers/staging/rt2870/../rt2860/sta_ioctl.c > >> > > >> > Sorry, but that '/staging/' thing in there means we cannot support this. > >> > If you must, take your query to the staging list, > >> > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (according to MAINTAINERS). > >> > >> Forwarded, thanks. > >> > >> ....hm. Does "If you must" mean reports aren't welcome? > > > > To be honest, I don't know. I'd rather see people use the rt2x00 code > > instead of spending time cleaning up that mess (the code you've pasted > > was pretty bad!). But you may or may not find somebody who cares about > > that, just rather unlikely on this list. > > What is appreciated is people with time to compare both code paths, > and report some inconsistancies, specially about card initialization > and general handling. > > To be hones, we, the rt2x00 team, find Ralink's code to be very > difficult to follow, and combersome most of the times. > This is very true, I had too many questions about the different symbols, and task vs pid variations etc etc....and so many macro usage :-).... But thank you for all the efforts of debugging!!!! -- Regards, Peter Teoh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
