On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 03:11:25PM -0700, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > and that is what it should NOT imply. The policy if it applies to all > internal devices, all devices in general or just WiFi or Bluetooth for > example is up to the user. > > We are NOT going to have any kind of RFKILL policy in the kernel in the > future. We will remove rfkill-input once we have a proper userspace > solution (aka rfkilld or similar). We seem to be talking at cross purposes here. My objection to the name KEY_RFKILL is that it gives no indication what it's meant to be or why it's different to KEY_WLAN. KEY_RFKILL implies that it's the only input component that an rfkill policy agent needs to listen to, which isn't the case. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
