Hi Matthew, > > actually if the key is clearly hardwired to WLAN, then it should not > > even show up as input event at all. This is one of the mis-concepts of > > the old RFKILL subsystem. No need to send an input event if the platform > > driver is going to rfkill that device anyway. > > There's still a policy decision. Does it kill internal devices, or does > it kill all attached wlan devices? > > > Remember that in the end it is just a key and whatever the user does > > with it is users policy. So in summary it is up to the platform driver > > to emit the proper key. For some it might be still KEY_WLAN, for other > > it might be KEY_RFKILL. Sounds fair? > > I agree on the technical side, but not the naming. KEY_WLAN is an > rfkill-related key, so introducing KEY_RFKILL is potentially confusing. > KEY_RFKILL_ALL isn't. why is it confusing? I don't understanding your argument here. I think the KEY_RFKILL_ALL is confusing is the user policy then only kills WiFi devices or toggles between various on/off combinations. Regards Marcel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
