On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 18:17 +0400, Igor Perminov wrote: > And in case we introduce the FIF_PSPOLL flag, what the exact semantics > will it have? When the FIF_CONTROL flag is passed to a driver, but the > FIF_PSPOLL one isn't, should the driver filter out PS Poll frames (a) or > not (b)? Like all filter flags, FIF_PSPOLL would mean "give us PSPOLL frames please", so (b). > May be it would be better to take into account the FIF_PSPOLL flag when > the FIF_CONTROL one isn't passed only (choice b) to be compatible with > the current implementation? I.e. the device should receive PS Poll > frames if either FIF_CONTROL or FIF_PSPOLL is passed (or both of them, > of course). I think it might make more sense to just set FIF_PSPOLL in mac80211 if FIF_CONTROL is being set for some reason. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
