On Thu 2009-07-23 16:45:22, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > Note that the "why" is unreliable by design. Network driver will > > > > ignore WoL during run-time, right? > > > > > > "Why" is unrealible? I don't follow your reasoning. It should be as > > > reliable as "who"... > > > > See above. The wakeup events race with each other. > > We deliver them all. It is that simple. The rest is up to userspace. Ok, but then we should not be talking about wake up events, but... events. Like "lid opened", "wake packet came", ... . And deliver them even when they happen during run-time. That's okay with me. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
