On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 12:46 +0200, Helmut Schaa wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 23. Juli 2009 schrieb Johannes Berg:
> > On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 12:14 +0200, Helmut Schaa wrote:
> > > Use a bitfield to store the current scan mode instead of two boolean
> > > variables {sw,hw}_scanning. This patch does not introduce functional
> > > changes but allows us to enhance the scan flags later (for example
> > > for background scanning).
> >
> > > + if (test_bit(SCAN_SW_SCANNING, &local->scanning))
> >
> > Do we actually need atomic bitops?
>
> No (at least not yet). That's why I used __set_bit. test_bit seems to not
> have a non-atomic equivalent. Or did you mean not to use *_bit functions
> at all?
Sorry, you're right, I got confused.
johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
