Am Donnerstag, 23. Juli 2009 schrieb Johannes Berg:
> On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 12:14 +0200, Helmut Schaa wrote:
> > Use a bitfield to store the current scan mode instead of two boolean
> > variables {sw,hw}_scanning. This patch does not introduce functional
> > changes but allows us to enhance the scan flags later (for example
> > for background scanning).
>
> > + if (test_bit(SCAN_SW_SCANNING, &local->scanning))
>
> Do we actually need atomic bitops?
No (at least not yet). That's why I used __set_bit. test_bit seems to not
have a non-atomic equivalent. Or did you mean not to use *_bit functions
at all?
Helmut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
