On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 10:53 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Johannes Berg<johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi! > > > > With the recent work I've done in cfg80211 for nl80211 and wext, we've > > mostly removed wext code everywhere. The only thing missing right now is > > the key support, and I think then we can declare cfg80211's wext compat > > layer pretty much done in terms of what mac80211 had -- orinoco will > > need the sensitivity (or AP density) thing but I'm not sure how we > > should do that since it's a value that is hardware dependent -- we'll > > need to have very good discovery code for the allowed values (unlike > > wext where you can set 0..3 and don't know what that means). Anyway, > > that wasn't the point of this email. > > > > Currently, if you use wpa_supplicant -Dwext and -Dnl80211 mixed, > > -Dnl80211 gets confused because -Dwext will set a 32-byte random SSID to > > "disconnect". > > When do we disconnect like this? Upon initialization of wpa_supplicant > -Dwext -Dnl80211 ? When you shut down wpa_supplicant -Dwext it does that. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
