2009/7/9 Hin-Tak Leung <hintak.leung@xxxxxxxxx>: > Here is some info from Gabor (shouldn't this be reply-all rather than just me): > ------------------ > The v1 and v2 look identical (though the label on the device indicates > the revision). The v3 looks completely different. They all have > different USB IDs (v1 is stock RT73, v2 has a custom ID, while v3 is > AFAIK stock RT2070). > ------------------ > > I guess to be informative, may I suggest adding '(for v1 see rt73usb, > and v3 see rt3070)' or something similiar to the 'v2' change? > It is fair customary in Kconfig to mention even alternative/competing > drivers for the same device. And when you add v3 support to the rt3070 > driver, a reverse mention may be appropriate. (I guess I am spending > far too long on this discussion - but I reckon, the purpose of a > non-code-changing change is meant to be informative, so one might want > to be as informative as appropriate without being too wordy...) > Yes, sorry, it was intended to be reply-to-all, but Gmail's default-reply-to-all feature appears to be broken. -- Vista: [V]iruses, [I]ntruders, [S]pyware, [T]rojans and [A]dware. :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html