2009/7/9 Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hin-Tak Leung wrote: >> >> if they are not labelled v1/v2/v3 as such, it may be more >> useful/informative to change to >> >> [some variant of ] ... [(other variants are supported by the >> rt2070/rt3070 modules)] >> >> instead of just adding [v2] to the end. > > I don't know about the box as I bought mine used on Ebay, but the > label on the device clearly states that it is a WG111v2. > > Larry > > But that's a Netgear WG111v2 ? We are talking about Linksys WUSB54GC-EU and its v1/v2/v3 . I am just thinking that if it is for informative purposes (for those who actually selectively build their kernel modules), adding a bit more info, such as suggesting to use rt73usb/rt2070/rt3070 modules, won't hurt. Incidentally I like to know a bit more about this patch - presumably Marcin has such a device? I am also a little curious, as this commit should be accompanied by a corresponding update in another Kconfig which supports the device? I am not trying to be picky, but for an informative (non-code-changing) patch, it can be more informative. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
