On 07/07/2009 07:15 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 7:48 AM, John W. Linville<linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 09:10:52PM +1000, David Ross wrote:
Actually it is required to be a mutual BASIC rate (not extended rates) -
not necessarily the "lowest possible" - David.
True, but FWIW I think all of our rate scaling algorithms choose the
lowest rate.
And then iwlwifi and ath9k have their own rate control algo, and at
least ath9k uses the lowest valid rate IIRC.
Luis
I've found the code in ath9k and you are right, it always chooses the
lowest rate.
So, basically to transmit multicast frames at a better bitrate I have
to hack the rate control algorithm, right?
Thanks,
Valentin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
