On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 03:20, Dave<kilroyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Julian Calaby wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 08:21, David Kilroy<kilroyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: David Kilroy <kilroyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Acked-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> net/wireless/wext-compat.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- >>> 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/net/wireless/wext-compat.c b/net/wireless/wext-compat.c >>> index 9e56f35..7dbe6c6 100644 >>> --- a/net/wireless/wext-compat.c >>> +++ b/net/wireless/wext-compat.c >>> @@ -204,8 +204,19 @@ int cfg80211_wext_giwrange(struct net_device *dev, >>> range->avg_qual.noise = range->max_qual.noise / 2; >>> range->avg_qual.updated = range->max_qual.updated; >>> >>> - range->enc_capa = IW_ENC_CAPA_WPA | IW_ENC_CAPA_WPA2 | >>> - IW_ENC_CAPA_CIPHER_TKIP | IW_ENC_CAPA_CIPHER_CCMP; >>> + range->enc_capa = IW_ENC_CAPA_WPA | IW_ENC_CAPA_WPA2; >> >> Should this should go into the for loop too, like how patch 5 works? > > Err... patch 5 moves this line into the for loop. I moved these in > separate patches because: You know, it does. Argh! This is what you get for not reading the patches properly. > As it happens, no-one has objected (yet). Hmm, yes. > Apologies if I've completely misunderstood you. No, you haven't. Sorry for the noise. Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx .Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
