On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 16:55 +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 16:38 +0200, Gábor Stefanik wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:02 AM, Bob Copeland<me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Here's v2 of the SDIO interface for wl12xx, still with a FIXME or two. > > > > > > For my part, this is mainly a port of the Google/TI Android SDIO > > > interface logic to the existing SPI driver. I have confirmed that > > > the driver associates and sends some traffic. > > > > > > Pierre, hoping to get your perspective on the SDIO bits in patch 7, > > > since I very likely don't know what I'm doing :) Especially regarding > > > the platform code setup, in which the correct GPIOs have to be written > > > to turn on the device before probe will work. For the SPI interface, > > > we use spi_register_board_info() for a similar purpose, but I'm not > > > sure if there is a standard way to do that for SDIO. This copies > > > Google's platform driver for now. > > > > > > Conversion to readl/writel etc where appropriate is TODO. > > > > > > Bob Copeland (7): > > > wl12xx: separate bus i/o code into io.c > > > wl12xx: use wiphy_dev instead of wl->spi->dev > > > wl12xx: introduce wl12xx_if_operations struct > > > wl12xx: make wl12xx_set_partition bus agnostic > > > wl12xx: move module probe methods into spi.c > > > wl12xx: split spi interface into separate module > > > wl12xx: add sdio support > > > > > > drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/Kconfig | 24 +++- > > > drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/Makefile | 10 +- > > > drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/acx.c | 3 +- > > > drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/boot.c | 3 +- > > > drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/cmd.c | 15 +- > > > drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/event.c | 6 +- > > > drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/io.c | 181 +++++++++++++++++++++ > > > drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/io.h | 62 +++++++ > > > drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/main.c | 152 ++++-------------- > > > drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/ps.c | 3 +- > > > drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/rx.c | 10 +- > > > drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/sdio.c | 250 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/spi.c | 289 ++++++++++++++------------------- > > > drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/spi.h | 40 ----- > > > drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/tx.c | 64 ++++---- > > > drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251.c | 9 +- > > > drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl12xx.h | 14 ++- > > > 17 files changed, 752 insertions(+), 383 deletions(-) > > > create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/io.c > > > create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/io.h > > > create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/sdio.c > > > > Can we expect vlynq any time soon? > I guess we need: > > 1) A linux vlynq driver for that, and last thing I saw [1], it wasnt > really pretty/ready This: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/4/259 seems to be a bit better... > 2) A device that would have a wl12xx chip connected to the host through > vlynq. > > Cheers, > Samuel. > > [1] http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0906.0/00155.html > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
