Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/7] wl12xx SDIO interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le Thursday 11 June 2009 16:38:46 Gábor Stefanik, vous avez écrit :
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:02 AM, Bob Copeland<me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Here's v2 of the SDIO interface for wl12xx, still with a FIXME or two.
> >
> > For my part, this is mainly a port of the Google/TI Android SDIO
> > interface logic to the existing SPI driver.  I have confirmed that
> > the driver associates and sends some traffic.
> >
> > Pierre, hoping to get your perspective on the SDIO bits in patch 7,
> > since I very likely don't know what I'm doing :)  Especially regarding
> > the platform code setup, in which the correct GPIOs have to be written
> > to turn on the device before probe will work.  For the SPI interface,
> > we use spi_register_board_info() for a similar purpose, but I'm not
> > sure if there is a standard way to do that for SDIO.  This copies
> > Google's platform driver for now.
> >
> > Conversion to readl/writel etc where appropriate is TODO.
> >
> > Bob Copeland (7):
> >  wl12xx: separate bus i/o code into io.c
> >  wl12xx: use wiphy_dev instead of wl->spi->dev
> >  wl12xx: introduce wl12xx_if_operations struct
> >  wl12xx: make wl12xx_set_partition bus agnostic
> >  wl12xx: move module probe methods into spi.c
> >  wl12xx: split spi interface into separate module
> >  wl12xx: add sdio support
> >
> >  drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/Kconfig  |   24 +++-
> >  drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/Makefile |   10 +-
> >  drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/acx.c    |    3 +-
> >  drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/boot.c   |    3 +-
> >  drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/cmd.c    |   15 +-
> >  drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/event.c  |    6 +-
> >  drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/io.c     |  181 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/io.h     |   62 +++++++
> >  drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/main.c   |  152 ++++--------------
> >  drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/ps.c     |    3 +-
> >  drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/rx.c     |   10 +-
> >  drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/sdio.c   |  250
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/spi.c    |  289
> > ++++++++++++++------------------- drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/spi.h    |
> >   40 -----
> >  drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/tx.c     |   64 ++++----
> >  drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1251.c |    9 +-
> >  drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl12xx.h |   14 ++-
> >  17 files changed, 752 insertions(+), 383 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/io.c
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/io.h
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/sdio.c
>
> Can we expect vlynq any time soon?

That would be really great. FYI, vlynq bus support was added to -mm tree few 
days ago. Do you guys know how much wl12xx differs from acx111 ?
-- 
Best regards, Florian Fainelli
Email : florian@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://openwrt.org
-------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux