On Sun, 07 Jun 2009, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > > You can remove the EPO functionality and add a "switch all radios off" > > and "switch all radios on" accell commands. But that's all you can do > > if you depend on userspace. It will -not- be EPO. > > > > You can have EPO in the kernel, and have userspace command the kernel to > > enter and exit EPO state. > > I fully disagree with you here and your concept of EPO and how it is > suppose to work is fully flawed. EPO is a policy and if you define it as Just rename it to something else. Whether the current code can achieve what EPO is suposed to be is beside the point. Just rename that functionality to something else, as the direction you want to go is clearly NOT one suitable for something named "EPO". -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
