On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 09:31:31AM +0100, Alan Jenkins wrote: > Mattia Dongili wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 12:36:58PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 11:31 +0100, Alan Jenkins wrote: >>> >>>> The re-written rfkill core ensures rfkill devices are initialized to >>>> the system default state. The core calls set_block after registration >>>> so the driver shouldn't need to. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>> Good catch, thanks. >>> >> >> Just to confirm, is this patch going to sit in the wireless-testing tree >> and you will submit it for inclusion together with the rfkill work >> right? >> > > Yes. I probably didn't need to ping you at this point. > > It just bothered me because I was effectively reverting a recent commit. > I figuired I should let you know. In case it didn't work, when it was > merged you'd know why I did it and who to blame. But there is always Git > history for that :-). Errm... now that I look at that patch more closely, the code you're modifying is not upstream either. Anyway thanks for the ping, I'll take a look at what's going on in the wireless-testing tree ;) cheers -- mattia :wq! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
