On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 09:06:57PM -0400, Bob Copeland wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:02 PM, henk <henk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Wouldn't it be better to reverse the deinitialisation? To make sure we > > dont hit an interrupt in between? Like: > > > > ? ? ? ?ath5k_beacon_disable(sc); > > ? ? ? ?ec->vif = NULL; > > Yeah, actually I gave this some thought but I can't now rationalize > the current order, so maybe I just goofed. > > -- > Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com I have tested hostapd+ath5k (only master mode without VLANs) for a few days now with the new patches. System seems stable no glitches found. I have aggregated your patches against compat-wireless-2009-06-01: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13381#c5 I would say a new milestone in ath5k driver development has been reached with working AP support. Thanks! Henk -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
