On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 18:36 +0100, David Kilroy wrote: > Signed-off-by: David Kilroy <kilroyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Not sure if this is how we want to detect WPA/WPA2 capability, but from > what I've read this is valid. An alternative would be to add a > capabilities flag to struct wiphy. Seems fine to me, and 1 through 4 as well, all Acked-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
