Search Linux Wireless

Re: Throughput is not changed when setting to a much higher bit rate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/5/22 Andrey Yurovsky <andrey@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> On Thu, 21 May 2009 16:11:17 -0700, Andrey Yurovsky <andrey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Dan Williams <dcbw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 08:00 +0800, Dongas wrote:
>>>>> 2009/5/21 Dan Williams <dcbw@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>> > On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 22:48 +0800, Dongas wrote:
>>>>> >> 2009/5/20 John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>> >> > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 01:48:32AM +0800, Dongas wrote:
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >> Why the bandwidth is not changed when bit rate is changed to
>>> 11Mb/s?
>>>>> >> >> Any thing wrong?
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > More errors at higher bit rate, resulting in more retries?  Just
>>> a
>>>>> >> > thought...
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> Is there a quick way to verify this possible reason? I'm using
>>> Libertas driver.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> BTW, my sdio host driver is using polling mode to handle SDIO IRQ.
>>>>> >> Could this be the cause of such poor performance?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Definitely.  With libertas, the largest class of issues by *far*
>>> that
>>>>> > we've seen are controller related.  I seem to recall that I've
>>> pulled
>>>>> > about 6Mbps through the card using a normal Ricoh controller from a
>>>>> > Fujitsu laptop.  I can recheck that.
>>>>>
>>>>> AFAIK, most old laptop ,including my x61, doesn't support SDIO in HW.
>>>>> So did Ricoh controller you tested use polling mode to handle SDIO IRQ?
>>>>> Which clock of controller and which bit rate did you test?
>>>>
>>>> Actually, most of the older machines *can* do SDIO, those made from
>>>> about 2006 - 2009.  These days a lot of the SD "controllers" are
>>>> actually USB-based mass-storage converters and cannot do SDIO, they are
>>>> essentially 10-in-1 cardreaders.
>>>>
>>>> What is the 'lspci' output for your Thinkpad?  If the controller isn't
>>>> in 'lspci' but is in 'lsusb', then it's quite unlikely to work because
>>>> of the above reason, I think.
>>>
>>> Right, you need a real SDIO (vs. SD storage) controller on the PCI
>>> bus.  However I can confirm that the ThinkPad X61 (and T61) controller
>>> does full SDIO and you can plug Libertas SDIO cards into it.  The
>>> older X-series ThinkPads (I tried the X40 and X41) work great too.
>>
>> Great, since the os running on x61 is windows vista, i just run linux in
>> vmware.
>> So do you know whether the windows driver for x61 supports full SDIO
>> well(including SDIO interrupt in HW)?
>
> Oh.  Well, you need to run Linux right on the hardware (ie: not in
> VMWare or any visualization software) for SDIO to work.  I don't know
> anything about Windows.  I can confirm, from personal experience, that
> the X61's SDIO works fine for Libertas in Linux.

OK.Thanks for your info.
BTW, do you know whether the X61's SD/SDIO controller supports SDIO IRQ in HW?
Or it just works on polling mode for SDIO IRQ?

Regards
Dongas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux