On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 07:54:23AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Do these patches need to go to 2.6.30? > > Considering that it locked up my box, I would think that it should. Well, > at least the change that checks for the infinite loop. Yeah, I just wasn't sure if you were using that or -next (which should be fixed, I guess.) I mistakenly thought Nick posted commit ishs but they were blobs, the actual commit was: e5f1d7f3c192c8ebeb492427bab84611ed5568eb "ath5k: fix interpolation with equal power levels" in wireless-testing. Those loops really want a helper function... Hmm, not too familiar with this particular code but getting back -32768 in the degenerate case seems wrong so I'd be inclined towards a hybrid version of the two that also sanity checks the steps (corrupt eeproms are bad, but one rather likely corruption is a big block of ones or zeroes). -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
