On Mon, 18 May 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Btw., why did the patch (and the revert) make any difference to the
> test? Timing differences look improbable.
It's the change from
!signal_group_exit(signal)
to
!sig_kernel_only(signr)
and quite frankly, I still don't see the point.
The comment seems to be wrong too:
If SIGSTOP/SIGKILL originate from a descendant of container-init they are
never queued (i.e dropped in sig_ignored() in an earler patch).
If SIGSTOP/SIGKILL originate from parent namespace, the signal is queued
and container-init processes the signal.
since the bug was that the SIGSTOP (from within the same container) was
_not_ ignored like the comment says.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
