* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 05/17, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13107 > > > Subject : LTP 20080131 causes defunct processes w/2.6.30-rc1 > > > Submitter : Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Date : 2009-04-09 15:43 (38 days old) > > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b3bfa0cba867f23365b81658b47efd906830879b > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123929187208953&w=4 > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/10/193 > > > Handled-By : Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Oleg says in that thread that it's as-designed, and followup > > questions were not replied to (yet). > > Yes, I think this is false alarm. Perhaps I missed something, and > I am waiting for more info from Kumar, but it looks like ltp was > already changed to skip the "{ PTRACE_ATTACH, 1, EPERM }" test on > kernels after 2.6.25 Btw., why did the patch (and the revert) make any difference to the test? Timing differences look improbable. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
