On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 07:29:43AM -0700, Alan Jenkins wrote: > On 5/1/09, Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > We forgot to lock using the cfg80211_mutex in > > wiphy_apply_custom_regulatory(). Without the lock > > there is possible race between processing a reply from CRDA > > and a driver calling wiphy_apply_custom_regulatory(). During > > the processing of the reply from CRDA we free last_request and > > wiphy_apply_custom_regulatory() eventually accesses an > > element from last_request in the through freq_reg_info_regd(). > > > > This is very difficult to reproduce (I haven't), it takes us > > 3 hours and you need to be banging hard, but the race is obvious > > by looking at the code. > > > > This should only affect those who use this caller, which currently > > is ath5k, ath9k, and ar9170. > > > > EIP: 0060:[<f8ebec50>] EFLAGS: 00210282 CPU: 1 > > EIP is at freq_reg_info_regd+0x24/0x121 [cfg80211] > > This looks like the same bug I reported seeing on bootup (100% of the > time). I'll test wireless-testing again for V9 of the rfkill rewrite, > so at that point I'll try to confirm that this patch fixes my problem. Any luck? Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
