Search Linux Wireless

Re: [RFC] regulatory information interpretation rules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 11:57 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:

>  4) This is easier to formulate algorithmically:
>     USE_FLAGS = 0
>     for k = 1 .. n
>         if CENTER in (MIN_k, MAX_k]:
>             USE_FLAGS |= FLAGS_k

That wasn't what I intended... What I did intend to say is this:

USE_FLAGS = 0
for k = 1 .. n
    if (CENTER - BW/2, CENTER + BW/2) intersects (MIN_k, MAX_k]
        USE_FLAGS |= FLAGS_k

since we want to take into account all flags even if the channel just
overlaps a little with a specific range.

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux